Hahaha, that one works pretty well. It's the Dilbert Asylum!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

It was a bit more work than the other one too.

http://edible-hat.livejournal.com/205117.html

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

This one works better though, IMHO!

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

well the big joke of the other one is that Dilbert wasn't in the strip to begin with, so the version with Dilbert removed is identical to the original version.

In other news, "Dilbert" is in the Firefox spell checker dictionary, and "dilbert" isn't.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Oh, now I geddit. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

I'd de-Dilbert the latest strip (it would be hilarious) but I can't be bothered so you'll just have to imagine it.

http://www.dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20080318.html

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

That would work...

I'm wondering how well it would work with Calvin & Hobbes without Hobbes, haha..

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

That would be awesome. Might work best if you leave in the stuffed toy version of Hobbes (the one he "turns into" when other people are around)

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Yeah. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

I'd would think the thrust would be to show it without Calvin...

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

then it would be titled "And Hobbes". Which would be awesome.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)